A Comparison of the Effect of a Conjoint Analysis Based Values Clarification Exercise, Rating and Ranking Exercise, and Balance Sheet for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Making
This study will compare effect of a conjoint analysis based values clarification exercise,
ranking and rating, and a balance sheet on screening test preferences for colorectal cancer
screening and prostate cancer screening using online surveys. Recruitment will be conducted
through Survey Sampling International (SSI), an online survey research firm. Participants
will be randomized to one of three arms to take online surveys. Patients will complete
either a conjoint analysis task, in which they will be asked to make a series of choices
between hypothetical screening testing strategies with different attributes; a rating and
ranking task for these same attributes; or they will make a choice after viewing a balance
sheet of attributes.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Participant-reported most important attribute from survey
The single most important colon cancer or prostate cancer screening attribute indicated by the participant surveys. Each participant will be randomly assigned to take one of three survey versions: either (1) a conjoint analysis task wherein they will be asked to make a series of choices between hypothetical screening testing strategies with different attributes; (2) a rating and ranking task for these same attributes; or (3) they will make a choice after viewing a balance sheet of attributes.
1 day
No
Michael Pignone, MD, MPH
Principal Investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
United States: Institutional Review Board
UCRF-CARR2-11-0861
NCT01558583
July 2011
October 2011
Name | Location |
---|---|
Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research | Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 |