FLT-PET/CT vs FDG-PET/CT for Therapy Monitoring of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
-Primary Objective
Investigate whether the PPV of FLT-PET/CT is significantly higher than that of FDG-PET/CT by
following up patients for at least 24 months post-therapy or until evidence of persistent
disease/disease progression.
-Secondary Objectives
Investigate whether the event free survival (EFS) of patients with FDG-PET/CT-positive and
FLT-PET/CT negative scans is not significantly lower than that of patients with concordantly
negative FDG-PET/CT and FLT-PET/CT scans and that the NPV or FLT-PET/CT is similar to that
of FDG-PET/CT
Correlate interim FLT-PET/CT and FDG-PET/CT with the International Prognostic Index (IPI), a
well-established predictor of outcome in DLBCL, to determine their independent prognostic
value from the IPI
Interventional
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 3'-deoxy-3'-[F-18]-fluorothymidine (FLT) Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) versus Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)PET/CT
24 Months
No
Dr Andrew Quon
Principal Investigator
Stanford University
United States: Food and Drug Administration
LYMIMG0001
NCT01410630
September 2011
September 2015
Name | Location |
---|---|
University of Nebraska Medical Center | Omaha, Nebraska 68198-3330 |
Stanford University School of Medicine | Stanford, California 94305-5317 |
MD Anderson Cancer Center - University of Texas | Houston, Texas |