A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Utility of Emerging Laboratory Assessments Used in Conjunction With Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy (FOB) in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) and Leukemia Patients With Acute Respiratory Symptoms and Pulmonary Infiltrates
Proper diagnosis and prompt treatment favorably impacts survival in the post transplant
setting, but is often difficult and frequently results in inappropriate or late therapy. Low
yields may be linked with empiric antibody therapy begun prior to the procedure, delayed
time to procedure, procedure technique, the presence of graft versus host disease (GVHD),
neutropenia, and diffuse infiltrates (as opposed to localized infiltrates or focal masses
and nodules). One recent study found that early FOBs (less than or equal to 4 days between
detection of pulmonary infiltrates and FOB) were 2.5 times more likely to establish a
diagnosis of pneumonia compared to late examinations. Delaying this procedure(greater than 5
days between detection of pulmonary infiltrates and FOB) was associated with drug resistant
organisms, polymicrobial infections, and worsened patient prognosis.
Interventional
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Diagnostic Yield
1.1 To determine the diagnostic yield related to fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and leukemia patients with acute respiratory symptoms and pulmonary infiltrates utilizing both current standard of care microbiology testing and emerging molecular genetic laboratory assessments.
30 days
No
H. Kent Holland, MD
Principal Investigator
Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia
United States: Institutional Review Board
NSH 909
NCT01328873
March 2011
December 2014
Name | Location |
---|---|
Northside Hospital | Atlanta, Georgia 30342 |