Comparison of Plerixafor and G-CSF Versus G-CSF Alone for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Lenalidomide
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Ability to reach target collection of 5 x 10^6 CD34+ cells/Kg with =< 2 days of
leukaphereses using one of two mobilization regimens.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Percentage of patients achieving target goal CD34+ cell dose (as above) in =< 5 days of
leukaphereses.
II. Compare collections between different mobilization regimens in those patients who are
crossed over from one mobilization regimen to the other.
III. Compare days of apheresis, need for hospitalization during mobilization, and need for
remobilization between mobilizing groups.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive G-CSF subcutaneously (SC) once daily (QD) on days 1-8.
ARM II: Patients receive G-CSF SC QD on days 1-7 and plerixafor SC QD on days 4-7.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 14 days.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Ability to reach target collection of 5 x 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg
In =< 2 days of leukaphereses
No
Hien Duong
Principal Investigator
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
United States: Federal Government
CASE3A10
NCT01301963
July 2011
Name | Location |
---|---|
Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Cleveland, Ohio 44106-5065 |
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Cleveland, Ohio 44195 |