Choosing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Hormonal Therapy for Breast Cancer Based on Gene Expression Profile
OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the feasibility of carrying out a large-scale multi-center trial in which RS
would be used to select treatment type in the neoadjuvant setting and whether patients with
intermediate RS are willing to be randomized between hormonal and chemotherapy.
II. To determine whether the type of neoadjuvant therapy (hormonal versus cytotoxic
chemotherapy) chosen on the basis of gene expression profiling will result in consistently
high rates of objective clinical responses in all patients.
III. To determine whether the type of neoadjuvant therapy (hormonal versus cytotoxic
chemotherapy) chosen on the basis of gene expression profiling will facilitate planned
breast-conserving therapy.
IV. To determine whether choosing the type of neoadjuvant therapy (hormonal versus cytotoxic
chemotherapy) on the basis of gene expression profiling will optimize the proportion of
patients overall who have a clinical complete response (cCR).
V. To determine whether choosing the type of neoadjuvant therapy (hormonal versus cytotoxic
chemotherapy) on the basis of gene expression profiling will optimize the pathologic
complete response (pCR) rate in the breast of patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy.
VI. To determine whether choosing the type of neoadjuvant therapy (hormonal versus cytotoxic
chemotherapy) on the basis of gene expression profiling will optimize the pCR rate in the
breast and nodes of patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy.
VII. To determine whether choosing the type of neoadjuvant therapy (hormonal versus
cytotoxic chemotherapy) on the basis of gene expression profiling will increase the
proportion of patients with Class 0 and 1 residual cancer burden (RCB) in patients receiving
cytotoxic chemotherapy.
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on recurrence score (RS) following
Oncotype Dx gene expression profiling.
GROUP I (Recurrence Score < 11): Patients receive neoadjuvant hormonal therapy comprising
tamoxifen (pre-menopausal women) or an aromatase inhibitor (post-menopausal women) for 4-6
months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
GROUP II (Recurrence Score 11-25): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive neoadjuvant hormonal therapy as in group I.
ARM II: Patients receive 6-8 courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising an
anthracycline/taxane based regimen over 4-6 months in the absence of disease progression or
unacceptable toxicity.
GROUP III (Recurrence Score > 25): Patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy as in arm II of
group II.
All patients then undergo surgery and receive hormonal therapy for at least 5 years.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Number of patients who refuse assigned therapy
If more than 1/3 of patients refuse assigned therapy, a larger study would either be deemed not feasible or would have to be designed with the assumption that this proportion of patients would refuse assigned treatment
Up to 2 years
No
Harry D. Bear, MD, PhD
Principal Investigator
Virginia Commonwealth University
United States: Institutional Review Board
MCC-13311
NCT01293032
April 2011
June 2015
Name | Location |
---|---|
Washington Cancer Institute | Washington, District of Columbia 20010 |
Methodist Cancer Center | San Antonio, Texas 78229-3902 |
Virginia Commonwealth University | Richmond, Virginia |
Carolina Medical Center | Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 |
Forsyth Regional Cancer Center | Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103 |
Cone Health Cancer Center | Greensboro, North Carolina |
Lynchburg Hematology Oncology Clinic, Inc | Lynchburg, Virginia 24501 |