A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Efficacy and Safety Study of Imiquimod Cream Following Cryosurgery for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses
In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy and
safety of imiquimod 3.75% cream following cryosurgery to treat clinically typical visible or
palpable AK lesions on the face was compared with that of placebo cream. Based on a 1:1
randomization, approximately 120 subjects applied imiquimod 3.75% cream daily (up to 500 mg
cream daily [18.75 mg imiquimod]) and approximately 120 subjects applied placebo cream
daily during two 2-week periods (Cycle 1 and Cycle 2) separated by 2 weeks of no treatment.
Subjects visited the clinic 9 times—1 screening/cryosurgery visit (additional visits might
be needed during the screening period to assess healing from the cryosurgery), 4 treatment
visits(treatment initiation at Weeks 0 and 4 and treatment follow-up at the end of Weeks 2
and 6), and 4 posttreatment visits (4, 8, 14, and 20 weeks after the last administration of
study treatment at the end of Week 6). The total study duration for a subject, including a
2-week screening period, was up to 28 weeks.
Prior to cryosurgery, subjects had to have ≥10 clinically typical visible or palpable AK
lesions in an area that exceeded 25 cm^2 on the face to be eligible for participation in the
study. At screening, a minimum of 5 visible lesions were not treated with cryosurgery, and 5
to 14 visible lesions were treated with cryosurgery. Subjects had to have at least 5 AK
lesions after the skin healed sufficiently from the cryosurgery to be eligible for
randomization to either imiquimod 3.75% or placebo cream. Subjects applied up to 2 packets
of study cream (500 mg total) as a thin layer to the entire face, avoiding the periocular
areas, lips, and nares; ears were excluded from both assessment and treatment. Study cream
was applied prior to normal sleeping hours and removed approximately 8 hours later with mild
soap and water. Rest periods from daily treatment could be approved by the investigator as
needed, with treatment resumption at the investigator's discretion.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Lesion Count
The primary efficacy endpoint was a comparison between the active and placebo treatment groups of percent change from baseline in the total AK lesion count at Week 26. All AK lesions on the face were included in the analysis—treated and untreated AK lesions at baseline (defined as the AK lesion count just prior to cryosurgery) and new lesions that appeared post-baseline.
Week 26
No
Sharon Levy, MD
Study Director
Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC
United States: Food and Drug Administration
GW01-0901
NCT00894647
May 2009
February 2010
Name | Location |
---|---|
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare | Evanston, Illinois 60201 |
Wake Forest Univ School of Medicine | Winston Salem, North Carolina 27157-1082 |
Therapeutics Clinical Research | La Jolla, California 92037 |
Oregon Medical Research Center | Portland, Oregon 97223 |
Dermatology Research Associates | Los Angeles, California 90045 |
Progressive Clinical Research | San Antonio, Texas 78229 |
Spencer Dermatology & Skin Surgery Center | St. Petersberg, Florida 33705 |
Palm Beach Dermatology | West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 |
MedaPhase, Inc. | Newman, Georgia 30263 |
Skin Specialists PC | Omaha, Nebraska 68144 |
Academic Dermatology Association | Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 |
DermResearchCenter of New York | Stony Brook, New York 11790 |
DermResearch Inc. | Austin, Texas 78759 |
Dermatology Treatment and Research Center | Dallas, Texas 75230 |