A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare Balloon Kyphoplasty to Non-surgical Fracture Management in the Treatment of Painful, Acute Vertebral Body Compression Fractures in Cancer Patients
1. STUDY OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS
1.1. Objectives
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of balloon
kyphoplasty treatment for painful, acute, VCFs as compared to standard non-surgical therapy
in patients with cancer.
1.2. Primary Endpoint
The primary endpoint of the study is the improvement in functional status, as measured by
the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) at 1 month. The primary hypothesis of the
study is that the mean improvement will be larger in subjects initially assigned to
management with balloon kyphoplasty. Note that all subjects will undergo 12 months of
follow-up after initial treatment assignment.
1.3. Secondary Endpoints
The following secondary endpoints will also be examined. Comparisons will be made at each
follow-up visit.
Safety:
- Rate of study treatment-related adverse events
- Change in neurological status
Clinical:
- Change in functional status as assessed with
- the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
- the Karnofsky Performance Scale
- Change in quality of life as assessed by the SF-36v2™ Health Survey
- Change in back pain, as measured by a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
- Change in back-pain analgesics used
- Change in ambulation status
- Changes in activities of daily living
- Time to treatment failure
Radiographic:
- Change in spinal deformity, defined as the degree of spine angulation as assessed by an
independent radiologist at the core laboratory
- Rate of subsequent vertebral body fractures, as assessed by independent radiologists at
the core lab
In each case, the study hypothesis is that treatment with balloon kyphoplasty will result in
an improvement in clinical or radiographic outcomes compared to baseline and compared to
non-surgical treatment, with a preservation of outcomes in long-term follow-up.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
The Functional Status, as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) at 1 Month
The full scale name is the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; it is a validated measure of physical disability due to back pain. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 24 (maximum disability)
Baseline and 1 Month
No
James Berenson, M.D.
Principal Investigator
Institute for Myeloma & Bone Cancer Research
United States: Institutional Review Board
SP0401 - CAFE Study
NCT00211237
May 2005
December 2009
Name | Location |
---|---|
University of Utah | Salt Lake City, Utah |
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center | Tampa, Florida 33612 |
Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland, Ohio 44195 |
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston, Texas 77030 |
Karmanos Cancer Center | Detroit, Michigan 48201 |
Valley Radiology Inc., UCSD | Escondido, California 92025 |
Boulder Neurosurgical Associates | Boulder, Colorado 80304 |
Sibley Memorial Hospital | Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 |
Greater Oncology Associates | Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 |