Phase III Randomized Study of RFS 2000 (9-Nitro-Camptothecin, 9-NC) Versus Gemcitabine HCl in Chemonaive Pancreatic Cancer Patients
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the overall survival, time to treatment failure, clinical benefit
response rate (analgesic consumption, pain intensity, performance status, and weight
change), and objective response rate in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable
locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with oral
nitrocamptothecin vs gemcitabine. II. Compare the toxicity of these 2 regimens in these
patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified
according to measurable disease (yes vs no), Karnofsky performance status (50-70% vs
70-100%), and prior radiotherapy. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Arm I:
Patients receive oral nitrocamptothecin on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every week for 8
courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with stable
or responding disease after week 8 may receive additional courses. Arm II: Patients receive
gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every week for 7 courses in the
absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then undergo 1 week of
rest. Patients with stable or responding disease after week 8 may receive gemcitabine IV
over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 4 weeks. Pain is assessed within
7 days prior to study, at days 28 and 56 during study, and then every 28 days after
completion of study. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year or until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 994 patients (497 per arm) will be accrued for this study
within 22 months.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Lawrence A. Romel, MS
Study Chair
Astex Pharmaceuticals
United States: Federal Government
CDR0000067905
NCT00005869
November 1998
Name | Location |
---|---|
SuperGen, Incorporated | Dublin, California 94568 |